"All my papers are proofread by PRS"

All my papers are proofread by PRS. Excellent work and good prices. Great company!

"The corrections are not far better than grammarly"

The corrections are not better than the software (Grammarly). I guess you could give some comments or advice to improve overall manuscripts. My first experience with this service (2019) was much better, but the last two were not that good.

"Disappointing"

The last two experiences I've had have not been good. After the English proofreading, I had to correct part of the text myself. Some examples: 1- healthy malignant patients with hematological malignancies (this does not exist!!); 2- Polymorphism analysis in DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B genes/ Analysis of the methylation profile in DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B genes (subtitles were not standardized); 3- unmethylated/ not methylated (the terms were not standardized) and other errors. The proofreader bothered to give an opinion on matters that do not concern him and forgot to do his job as an English proofreader. I inform you that if the journal to which I submitted the article requires an English review, I will request a free review from your team (which was already better).

"Professionalism"

Professionalism, speed and kindness!
Daniel Bucur

"Quick and accurate"

Quick and accurate

"REview over the average"

The review was accordingly with the expectations.
RAther quick and professional.

"quick editing"

quick editing

"Very nice service and a great work..."

Very nice service and a great work...

"The revision was not good"

The revision was not good, the reviewer criticized English quality of the manuscript. Grammar errors were introduced in the revision proccess. I submitted it to a different service and then the manuscript was approved.

"Quality work"

Fast, serious, very good workers