"Technical support didn't help instructor"

The content was good, but I was put off by the way the technical person treated the presenter. She logged on with two accounts and was experiencing feedback. Instead of asking her to log off both accounts and reconnect with one, he just told her to continue with the feedback she was hearing because the audience could not hear it. If you have ever tried to talk with feedback (your own words coming back at you), it is very difficult. I do not think he provided a good solution for the presenter. She did a great job considering the conditions but it had to affect her presentation. Several Compliance City people were on the call and did not speak up to help the presenter.

"There was a lot of great information"

There was a lot of great information. A rocky start with the getting the presentation going. Speaker was very good, but I didn't feel that the person introducing her was very good. She was having trouble with the audio and he seemed a bit impatient with her.

Also, still waiting for the email with additional documents that were mentioned during the presentation, When can I expect that?

"The webinar was very general not…Not helpful"

The webinar was very general not specific, most of the slides were read verbatim and rediscussed toward the end. The presented topics were moreso topics to think about when revisiting your handbook, why the handbook is in important, political changes that "could" impact. I felt this was unhelpful to anyone that has ever actually redone or reviewed their handbook.

"Great Information"

Great Information

"Not what I thought it was going to be"

I thought this was going to be a little more in-depth, not just a powerpoint that she read off of. Honestly, I didn't learn much more than I already knew.

"Just ok"

The title of the webinar was somewhat misleading, as it suggested a detailed discussion on the I-9 form and guidance on conducting an internal I-9 audit. However, the presentation primarily involved reading from the slides without offering in-depth insights or additional context. While there were a few useful tips regarding preparation in the event of a raid, several sections of the presentation seemed to deviate from the core topic, with some content focusing more on political commentary rather than policy-related information.

"It was literally a reading of the…"

It was literally a reading of the PowerPoint. I could do that myself.

"Not Worth the Price Tag"

It was a nice review, but the facilitator just reading the slides far from justified the cost of the course. This presentation style was neither engaging, nor was it any more informative than just purchasing the slide deck would have been. It was also extremely disorganized getting started as the facilitators were talking amongst one another on the webinar about who was to share their screen and figuring out technical difficulties. Overall, I would look at finding free, or lower cost resources if you are looking to get this information for 2024 year end. As for preparing for 2025, there was little useful information provided as for what to expect next year.

"The moderator was very hard to…"

The moderator was very hard to understand. The presenter was more wordy than necessary which made things confusing at times.
Thankyou.

"It wasn't what I expected"

It wasn't what I expected. I would have liked more information on the submission process, and IRIS.
I feel like it was basically, "There is a new form but don't worry, it's no big deal, just start using it now."
The trainer presented what he had in clear fashion, but it was very basic.