"I have a research professor who is very…"

I have a research professor who is very particular with grammar and APA 7th edition. The editing services offered by Editage was just what my paper needed to help get the maximum amount of points on my paper for grammar and APA, and essentially an A

"Now it’s my third time using your…"

Now it’s my third time using your services and they are very helpful. Thank you and I am looking forward continue writing papers with your help.

"Useful Checks and comments"

Checks and comments are useful and sharp. They help me so much.

"Edit pace and level of detail"

The editing takes perfect time as requested, non-exaggeration editing, has a nice flow structure of the editing and has a very detailed review.

"Reserve time for additional corrections"

SUMMARY

Many changes were carried out well in time but only a (conservatively estimated) fraction 0.9 contained sensible corrections (as was established later on). The remainder consisted of a 0.01 rate for the introduction of plain grammatical errors, which made me investigate the rest, leading to a 0.07 fraction of more errors introduced by Editage and (as turned out later on) a fraction 0.02 of unnecessary changes. A fraction of 0.01 were errors introduced by Editage that I had been unable to intercept and that surfaced only after submission of the edited paper.

To put this score in perspective: Editage introduced plain changes of meaning at a rate of 0.02 but an independent editor and native speaker did so at a rate of 0.03. (This editor introduced 1 plain grammatic error i.e. 0% and, contrary to Editage, made bold changes and commented on changes.) The changes of meaning should therefore be considered a natural phenomenon, due to the difficulty of the text or to be conceived as suggestions for other wordings.

The main problem is not the netto 0.01 error introduction rate (netto, that is, after additional corrections) but the considerable time needed for correction of the changes and for reacting otherwise on the 0.1 rate by which Editage made unreliable changes.

Editage returned ‘profuse apologies,’ made a total refund, and guaranteed to improve the service.

CONCLUSION

When contracting Editage for its advanced editing service (two native speakers who are experienced editors), reserve time for the case that additional corrections are needed.

"Outstanding Services"

I recently used Editage's services to edit and proofread my academic manuscripts, and I couldn't be more satisfied. Their team provided highly professional editing services with an astonishingly quick turnaround time for completion. I'm genuinely impressed with the quality of their work and their commitment to meeting tight deadlines. I'm delighted with the results, and I wholeheartedly recommend Editage to fellow researchers and academics. Thank you for your outstanding service!

"Very good"

Very good! It's efficiency

"Grateful for Your Efforts: A Review of Excellent Translation Services"

I wanted to express my sincerest gratitude for Editage' effort in translating my document. Their work demonstrated utmost care, attention to detail, and commitment to delivering professional level academic translation.

"Excellent review service!"

Excellent review service. In a relatively short time period an outstanding quality review has been performed. Very good knowledge of subject matter, journal requirements and excellent suggestions on grammar and consistency of the manuscript !

"Exceeded expectations, fast and quality services"

We had a brief time to submit a revised version of our manuscript after making edits. We required quick and quality service and Editage answered and delivered way beyond our expectation.
My interraction with the website was seamless, the services were clearly outlined. I was also able to communicate with a member of their team through email to give further instructions, and the responses were prompt. The prices are affordable, and they offer discounts.