Proof-Reading-Service.com
KJ
"Quality of proofread drop and not sutable for publication in high quality journal."
I used this survice for 5-6 years. In the past 2-5 year agro, this survice is a good Proof read.
However,in this year, I used this proofread many time and the quality drops significantly. Many mistake are found and not responsible for it.
I got bad experiance and change to othor survice that better than this.
JGG
"Single word corrections were good"
Single word corrections were good, while text editing did not significant add to the linguistic quality of the manuscript
Michal Kočí
Tariq Irtaimeh
"It was great experience dealing with…"
It was great experience dealing with prrof reading service .extremely professional expertise in their field and you are most punctual.
Nice dealing with your company
MARIUS VACARELU
Martin de Bree
Jon Peddie
"It was a great edit"
It was a great edit, not a mechanical one, it showed thought and understanding of the context
Utoomporn Surayot
Muhammad Asif
"There were multiple mistakes in the…"
There were multiple mistakes in the proofread document.
1. However was used two times in the same sentence
2. In so many paragraphs in addition to 'the' no other corrections were done.
3. Data was used as singular
4. Instead of a antiviral simple antiviral was used and lot more.
Roger Keller Celeste
"Social mobility and tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analyses"
Very good, quick and efficient. I will use it again.
Widget Preview
Add to your site